1. Statement of the Concept / Overview
When charge is distributed over a line, surface, or volume, the total electric force on a test charge is obtained by breaking the distribution into infinitesimally small charge elements and integrating the forces due to these elements.
2. Clear Explanation and Mathematical Derivation
For a continuous distribution, replace discrete charges (q_i) with infinitesimal charge elements [dq].
Force on a test charge [q_0] due to [dq] at distance [r]:
[d\vec{F}] [= k \dfrac{q_0,dq}{r^2} \hat{r}]
Total force:
[\vec{F}] [= \displaystyle \int d\vec{F}]
The form of [dq] depends on the type of distribution:
(1) Linear Charge Distribution
If [\lambda] = charge per unit length:
[
dq = \lambda dl
]
(2) Surface Charge Distribution
If [\sigma] = charge per unit area:
[
dq = \sigma dA
]
(3) Volume Charge Distribution
If [\rho] = charge per unit volume:
[
dq = \rho dV
]
Then integrate appropriately based on geometry and limits.
3. Dimensions and Units
| Quantity | Dimensions | SI Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Linear charge density ([\lambda]) | ([ITL^{-1}]) | C/m |
| Surface charge density ([\sigma]) | ([ITL^{-2}]) | C/m² |
| Volume charge density ([\rho]) | ([ITL^{-3}]) | C/m³ |
| Force | ([MLT^{-2}]) | Newton (N) |
4. Key Features
- Uses integration instead of simple Coulomb summation.
- Direction of force requires symmetry considerations.
- Eliminates the need to treat large bodies as point charges.
- Applicable to rods, rings, discs, cylinders, spheres, sheets, etc.
- Superposition principle is inherently built into the method.
- Continuous distribution is essential for real-world physics (e.g., capacitor plates, charged rods).
5. Important Formulas to Remember
| Situation | Force Expression |
|---|---|
| Small element [dq] on test charge [q_0] | [[d\vec{F}] = [k \dfrac{q_0 dq}{r^2} \hat{r}]] |
| Linear distribution | [dq = \lambda dl] |
| Surface distribution | [dq = \sigma dA] |
| Volume distribution | [dq = \rho dV] |
| Total force | [\vec{F}] [= \displaystyle\int d\vec{F}]] |
6. Conceptual Questions with Solutions
1. Why do we use integration for continuous charge distributions?
Because the distribution consists of infinitely many small charge elements. Only integration can sum the infinitesimal contributions from each element.
2. What replaces point charge \(q\) in continuous force calculations?
It is replaced by an infinitesimal charge element: \[ dq = \lambda dl,\ \sigma dA,\ \rho dV \]
3. Why is symmetry important?
Symmetry helps identify components of force that cancel out, simplifying integration significantly.
4. Can force due to a ring’s charge distribution have a radial component at its axis?
No. Radial components cancel by symmetry. Only the axial component survives.
5. Does force always depend on the entire charge distribution?
Yes. Even distant elements contribute, though with smaller magnitudes due to \[1/r^2\] dependence.
6. Why do opposite sides of a uniformly charged rod sometimes cancel forces?
Because direction varies across the rod; components along one direction may cancel due to symmetry.
7. Does additivity of charge still apply in continuous distributions?
Yes. Total charge is the integral of \[dq\]: \[ Q = \int dq \]
8. Why is a charged disc’s axial force non-zero but radial force zero?
Radial components from opposite elements cancel. Axial components add.
9. Why can’t we treat a long rod as a point charge near its length?
Because its dimensions are comparable to the distance. Point-charge approximation becomes invalid.
10. Does Coulomb’s law still apply to infinitesimal elements?
Yes. Coulomb’s law is applied to each element \[dq\], then integrated.
11. Why do continuous distributions produce smoother force variations?
Because the variations in \[dq\] are infinitesimal, giving continuous and smooth field/force behavior.
12. Can we use superposition with continuous forces?
Yes. Integration itself is a superposition of infinitesimal force elements.
13. Why is force along the axis of a ring easier to compute?
Only axial components survive; perpendicular components cancel fully.
14. What happens to force if the observation point is at infinity?
Force approaches zero since \[1/r^2\] dominates.
15. Does the method of integration give exact or approximate results?
Exact results, provided geometry and charge density are correctly defined.
7. FAQ / Common Misconceptions
1. Misconception: Only nearby charges contribute to force.
All charges contribute. Distant ones contribute less but never zero.
2. Misconception: We can break charge into large chunks instead of dq.
No. Only infinitesimal elements ensure accuracy in integration.
3. Misconception: Symmetry is optional.
No. Without using symmetry, integration becomes unnecessarily complicated.
4. Misconception: Direction of force is obvious from formula.
No. Direction must be determined from geometry and vector analysis.
5. Misconception: Continuous charge distribution is unrealistic.
Real objects contain enormous electrons → continuous approximation becomes extremely accurate.
6. Misconception: Only linear charge density is used.
Surface and volume charge densities are equally important for plates, spheres, cylinders.
7. Misconception: A ring behaves like a point charge on its axis.
No. Only at very large distances does it approximate a point charge.
8. Misconception: Force is always outward.
Direction depends on the sign of the test charge.
9. Misconception: The result of integration must always be non-zero.
Wrong. Symmetry can make the net force zero.
10. Misconception: Coulomb’s law is not used in continuous distributions.
It is used for each infinitesimal element \[dq\], then summed by integration.
8. Practice Questions (With Step-by-Step Solutions)
Question 1: Force on axis of a charged ring
A ring of radius [R] carries total charge [Q]. Find the force on a charge [q_0] placed on its axis at distance [x].
Solution:
- Take small element [dq] on the ring.
- Force due to [dq]:
[dF] [= k \dfrac{q_0,dq}{(R^2 + x^2)}] - Radial components cancel; only axial component remains:
[
dF_x = dF \cos\theta
] - From geometry:
[\cos\theta] [= \dfrac{x}{\sqrt{R^2 + x^2}}] - Integrate:
[F_x] [= \displaystyle \int dF_x] [= k q_0 x\dfrac{1}{(R^2+x^2)^{3/2}} \int dq] - (\int dq = Q)
Final Answer:
[F] [= k \dfrac{q_0 Q x}{(R^2 + x^2)^{3/2}}]
Question 2: Force due to a uniformly charged rod
A rod of length [L] has linear charge density [\lambda]. A charge [q_0] is placed at distance [a] from one end along its axis. Find the force.
Solution:
- Take element at distance [x];
[
dq = \lambda dx
] - Distance from charge = [(a + x)]
Force:
[dF] [= k\dfrac{q_0 \lambda dx}{(a+x)^2}] - Integrate from [0] to [L]:
[F] $= k q_0 \lambda \left[ -\dfrac{1}{a+x} \right]_0^L$
- Solve:
[F] $= k q_0 \lambda \left( \dfrac{1}{a} – \dfrac{1}{a+L} \right)$
Question 3: Force due to infinite line charge
Infinite line charge with density [\lambda]; find the force on charge [q_0] at perpendicular distance [r].
Use standard result for electric field:
[
E = \dfrac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_0 r}
]
Thus:
[F = q_0 E] [= \dfrac{q_0 \lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_0 r}]
Question 4: Force due to a uniformly charged disc
Axial field of disc is:
[E] $= \dfrac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} \left( 1 – \dfrac{x}{\sqrt{x^2 + R^2}} \right)$
Hence:
[
F = q_0 E
]
Question 5: Force due to a spherical shell (outside)
A spherical shell carries charge [Q]. A charge [q_0] is at distance [r > R].
Shell behaves like a point charge:
[
F = k \dfrac{q_0 Q}{r^2}
]